Skip to main content

Trends Influencing NZ or Internationally


For this weeks blog I will be discussing contemporary trends in New Zealand or internationally and for it I will be using Rolfe et al.’s (2001) reflective model. ‘Looking at trends informs our ideas about what might happen as we better understand what is already changing in education’s wider environment’ OECD. (2016) (p. 16)


What

Daggett (2014) identified five potentially disruptive emerging trends, of these I am focusing on the impact of digital learning, as I feel that that one is the most relevant to my practice. This trend, more than the others, captures my attention because since starting my Mind Lab journey I have become more aware of the emergence of new technologies within education and how they can be incorporated into my pedagogy. Also the fact that my school is slowly becoming a BYOD school. Personally, I feel that BYOD should be all or nothing rather than being brought in slowly but that could be the topic of a blog on its own.



So What
It is easy to see from the statistics that digital learning is a trend that is here to stay For example, Daggett (2014) stated that 71% of high school students used texting to communicate and 3 out of 10 students used Twitter. It would be interesting to see recent figures as I believe that the number of Twitter users within that age range would have gone up significantly and the texting number would have gone down, as from personal experience and questioning of my classes, most students now communicate through instant messaging such as Snapchat and Messenger. Digital learning within classrooms will throw up challenges, not only for myself but both nationally and internationally. Hanna et al. (2010) stated ‘The pedagogic model underlying too many schools and classrooms is still aimed at preparing students for the industrial economy, and is very different from the activities at the heart of knowledge-based organisations, societies and economies’ (p. 10). They also explained that ‘Students should become self-directed, lifelong learners, especially as they are preparing for jobs that do not yet exist, to use technologies that have not yet been invented, and to solve problems that are not yet recognised as problems’ (p. 9).




What Now
Obviously this means that, as schools we need to be looking at both what the curriculum we deliver looks like and how we deliver it. Even though technology and the internet is making the world a more connected place, this is a big task. In big cities where there may be more choice of career and/or opportunities this may be somewhat easier than smaller communities where those opportunities are hard to find. For example, a high school aged child in California may be able to visit Google headquarters and see first-hand the advancement in their A.I, and this may light a spark that sets the student off down a particular career path. That opportunity may not be as readily available to a high school child in, say, Middlesbrough U.K. Also as educators we need to look at our own preconceptions of digital learning and what that involves. I still, at times, see red when I see a student casually take a phone out of their pocket as my first instinct is to think that they are up to no good. I also know of this to be true with several of my colleagues and we need to change this mindset as the positives of incorporating digital learning into our pedagogy vastly outweigh the negatives, Daggett (2014) summed this up with this quote ‘Digital learning is a catalyst for college and career readiness. Today’s learners are digital natives—yet they come to school and power down their devices’ (p. 4). Dagget also went on to say ‘Although some schools still have a “no cell phone policy,” most students still bring their mobile devices to school—especially in high school—and use them to communicate, collaborate and solve problems, even if they are not part of a teacher’s lesson plan’ (p. 4). With this in mind we have to embrace this trend and school leaders should follow Dagget’s (2014) steps especially ‘creating a culture that supports change’ through staff PD, ‘creating a team within the school focused on the impact of the emerging trend’ and ‘network with other to share best practices’. One could argue that the recent set up of CoL’s are facilitating this last point.

Daggett, B. (2014). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/pdf/2014MSC_AddressingCurrentandFutureChallenges.pdf
Devaney, L. (2015). 100 districts that are digital learning innovators. Retrieved from https://www.eschoolnews.com/2015/12/11/digital-learning-546/
Hanna, D., David, I., & Francisco, B. (Eds.). (2010). Educational research and innovation the nature of learning using research to inspire practice: Using research to inspire practice. OECD publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/50300814.pdf
OECD. (2016) Trends Shaping Education 2016, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/trends_ edu-2016-en Daggett, B. (2014). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/pdf/2014MSC_AddressingCurrentandFutu reChallenges.pdf
Sherry, P. (2015). BYOD: What Training Professionals Need to Know. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/byod-training-professionals-need-know



Comments

  1. Hi Ian, you have made some great points here. I feel exactly the same on the BYOD, it should be all or nothing. It is the pain of my class when half of my students are running around other classes looking for devices. That's 5/10 minutes of a waste gone already. Again I agree with you on the snapchat and messenger, plus also instagram, they seem to be at the forefront when it comes to communication now as opposed to Facebook and texting. I'm guilty myself communicating with different people either texting, snapchatting or whatsapping! I thought it was funny when you said about how you automatically think the worst when a phone pops out as I have been guilty of this. The amount of times a student has said I'm googling the word or subject as it's faster than a chromebook! Sometimes I feel we are quite ahead when it comes to technology in the classroom but then you hit a wall. I see technology in the classroom for me 1 step forward and 2 steps back. My biggest challenge will be to use the up and coming technology appropriately and in the right way with the students. Hoping that as time goes on the two will smoothly merge together to help learning with technology in the classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ian,
    I enjoyed reading your post as I chose to focus on the impact of digital learning too. I agree it is most relevant to our practice and probably the biggest reason for me to take on The Mind Lab course. It is interesting that you feel that a BYOD approach should be all or nothing. My classes are BYOD and it has opened my eyes to a whole set of other problems that come with them! I also find it a challenge to keep up with the use of new technology and use it in the right way! There are so many possibilities and more evolving. The challenge will be staying on top of it all! Best of luck!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ian
    Yet another thought provoking blog from you! I did have a chuckle when you mentioned that as soon as your students pull out a phone you automatically think they are up to no good! I do this too, although not many primary school students are bringing phones to school as they would in high school. We are a digital one to one device classroom, and while we are the envy of many, it has its downside too. Although according to Daggett (2014) students come as digital natives, this is not always the case. They may be able to fire up their computer and play a game or use google to find some information but they have little to no experience in ascertaining whether that information is of good quality, can be trusted or, if in fact, is even real! The penchant for Year 7 and 8 students is to take the very first site that pops up, despite it being not trustworthy, and taking it as gospel. So herein lies yet another problem - not only using devices at the wrong time, but not being able to use them at the right time!

    Mindset definitely needs to be changed and possibly from the top down - as we are banned from having phones at staff meetings after school - not always the best way to create a positive environment for all concerned! Great blogging Ian... I hope you continue after Mindlab!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Ian,
    Thanks for sharing your blog. I found it very interesting to read. I completely agree with your comment that BYOD should be all or nothing. We slowly integrated it over a couple of years before finally saying enough is enough! It was very challenging being told to use technology but only having a small handful of students able to participate that way. There were no benefits compared to the now fully BYOD classroom where students can actually work digitally and collaboratively.
    I also find it interesting that literature suggests that students need to become self-directed learners. Blended learning always sounds amazing to me in theory but I struggle with the reality. Teaching in a small Southland rural school is has not been practical to experiment with this theory. Students often have after school jobs or commitments and it is impractical or they simply don’t have access to the online material due to the location of their house. We run a weekly google homework task for our Junior students where they have to log on and complete a short tasks online and submit it via Classroom. The purpose is to familiarise themselves with Classroom and submitting assessments before they become seniors. However, this year I have three students who don’t have access to the internet at home and their parents have asked me to give them paper copies (which is fine but completely undermines the purpose). I would be interested in hearing from other small schools who face similar issues with digital learning.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness in my practice

For this week's blog I am going to look at indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness in my practice. I will be using Rolfe’s model of reflection to help me and also Milnes (2017) action continuum to evaluate where I am and need to do. What is my understanding of indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness? Prior to moving to New Zealand I had done a fair bit of research on Maori and Pasifika cultures and practices and arrived feeling semi confident in my knowledge. Well that confidence soon left me, I was confused and mesmerized at the same time by the language and customs. I loved the way that Māori words where used in everyday language by the majority of people I met. The bilingual road signs reminded me of holidays to Wales where they had both English and Welsh on them, and similar to those holidays, I would be several kilometres down the road before I had mastered how to say it correctly. So I decided that I wanted to be able to pronounce people and place ...

Future-oriented Learning and Teaching

For this blog I am looking at “Changing the Script”: Rethinking learners’ and teachers’ roles and how the last 17 weeks of Mind Lab and researching have had an impact on my practice. When I first started on this journey I had a very definitive description of teaching, something that had been ingrained in my mind-set over the last eleven years of teaching and that was that I was the font on all knowledge within my subject. I felt that I had to dictate how the lessons went, exactly what was to be covered and how it would be addressed, with very little deviation from that planned route. Not surprisingly, when I rated myself against the 21 st century learning skills rubric, I did not come out favourably. The whole point of signing up to Mind Lab was to improve my practice so I was happy, yet extremely nervous, to try out anything. My first change within my pedagogy was to trial out some collaboration within senior classes, I wanted to see if students could support and educate their pe...